Last month, Ankara reportedly asked the US to deploy Patriot batteries on Turkey’s southern border following an escalation of tensions in Syria’s Idlib. Here’s a closer look at what could finally become Turkey’s missile system of choice given Ankara’s recent purchase of the Russian-made S-400 Triumf missile systems.

Ankara’s move on the Patriot border deployment will most likely raise many eyebrows given the performance characteristics of these two missile defence systems. The S-400 detects an enemy at a distance of up to 600 kilometres and tracks up to 300 targets simultaneously, while the Patriot operates at a distance of no more than 120 kilometres.

In terms of firing range, the Triumf also gets the better of the Patriot because the figures stand at 250 kilometres and 100 kilometres, respectively. The Russian system is capable of destroying a target moving at a speed of 4,800 metres per second, namely, even hypersonic missiles, something that is not the case with the Patriot, which hits objects flying at a speed of 2,500 metres per second.

What’s more, neither a rocket nor a helicopter will escape from the Triumf even at a minimum height, because the missile system will recognise and destroy a target located one hundred metres above the ground. In contrast, the Patriot is only effective at an altitude of 500 metres or higher and the system is not capable of detecting targets that move below this threshold.

Unlike its American competitor, the Triumf’s armaments include advanced ultra-manoeuvrable guided missiles as well as ultra-long-range missiles for the destruction of AWACS (airborne early warning and control) and electronic warfare aircraft, as well as command posts, along with ballistic and hypersonic missiles.

ALSO READ  Erdogan says Iran and Russia are not targets in Syria, only Syrian military

The another one of the Russian system’s advantages pertains to its ability to smoothly operate under conditions of intense electronic counter measures aimed at forcing enemy air defences to track fake targets. Despite its sophisticated characteristics, the Triumf is reportedly at least three times cheaper than the Patriot in terms of maintenance.

It seems that the Patriot only prevails over the Triumf when it comes to experience in combat, including Operation Desert Storm during the 1991 Gulf War between the US-led coalition and Iraq.

However, this experience did not prove to be that successful for the American system, which managed to intercept only 46 out of 130 Iraqi missiles. A similar failure occurred in September 2019, when the Patriots were unable to prevent cruise missiles and drones from staging massive strikes on Saudi oil facilities.

Apart from Turkey, the S-400, which is touted by both Russian and foreign experts as one of the world’s best anti-aircraft systems, could be purchased by India and Iraq, as New Delhi earlier signalled its readiness to acquire at least five S-400 batteries.

Pentagon: Turkey Won’t Get Patriot System Unless It Returns S-400 to Russia

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, meanwhile, said earlier this month that the Triumf systems will enter service in Turkey already in April, saying that the Turkish military is “continuing to learn to work with them”.

Washington has repeatedly lambasted Ankara over its move to buy the S-400s, which the US claims are incompatible with NATO security standards and might stop the White House from deciding on supplying Patriots to Turkey.

ALSO READ  Erdogan once again requests Patriot missiles from US

In September 2019, Erdogan signalled Turkey’s readiness to purchase the US missile defence systems along with the Russian S-400s. The statement, however, was followed by US Defence Department spokesperson Jonathan Hoffman telling reporters earlier this year that “Turkey is not going to receive a Patriot battery [of missile interceptors] unless it returns the S-400 [to Russia]”.

Erdogan, for his part, said at the time that the US had softened its stance on Turkey’s purchase of the Russian S-400 air defence systems and reduced its demands to asking Ankara not to put the weapon in active service.

 

Credit: Sputnik

 

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

Discuss

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of