BEIRUT, LEBANON (10:30 A.M.) – Last week, Saudi Arabia and the United States slammed the Syrian Arab Republic over several issues, including human rights abuses and election, during the Third Committee session at the U.N. General Assembly.

In particular, Saudi Arabia and the U.S. representatives criticized the Syrian government over their attacks on the Idlib Governorate, while condemning in their text, “the indiscriminate use of force by the Syrian regime against civilians, which has caused immense human suffering and fomented the spread of extremism and extremist groups and which demonstrates the continuing failure of the Syrian regime to protect its population create a safe haven and operating environment for crimes against humanity, and to implement the relevant resolutions and decisions of United Nations bodies.”

The text also included the condemnation of chemical weapons usage, which the sponsoring countries said were committed by the Syrian Arab Republic and Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL/IS/Daesh).

“Condemning in the strongest possible terms that chemical weapons have since 2012 been used in the Syrian Arab Republic, including as reported by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons-United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism in its reports of 2016 and 2017, 32 concluding that the Syrian Arab Armed Forces were responsible for the attacks which released toxic substances in Talmenes in 2014, in Sarmin and Qmenas in 2015, and that ISIL/Da’esh used sulfur mustard in Marea in 2015 and in Umm Hawsh in 2016 and that the Syrian Arab Republic was responsible for the release of sarin at Khan Shaykhun in 2017, and accordingly noting with great concern the reports of the fact-finding mission of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons regarding incidents in Ltamenah33 and Saraqib,34 as well as the final report regarding the incident alleged use of toxic chemicals as a weapon in Duma.”

The resolution also demanded free and fair elections, along with the implementation of the Geneva initiatives that call for a Syrian-led political process.

ALSO READ  US and EU begin ditching the Syrian opposition

“Reiterating that the only sustainable solution to the current crisis in the Syrian
Arab Republic is through an inclusive and Syrian-led political process, under the
auspices of the United Nations, that meets the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian
people, and the establishment of a constitutional committee that would prepare the
work for free and fair elections and political transition in line with Security Council
resolution 2254 (2015), with a view to establishing credible, inclusive and
non-sectarian governance, welcoming the establishment of the constitutional
committee that would prepare the work for free and fair elections and political
transition in line with Security Council resolution 2254 (2015), with a view to
establishing credible, inclusive and non-sectarian governance, with the full, equal and
meaningful participation of women, reaffirming in this regard the important role of
women in the prevention and resolution of conflicts and in peacebuilding, and
stressing the importance of their full participation and involvement in all efforts for
the maintenance and promotion of peace and security and the ne ed to increase their
role in decision-making with regard to conflict prevention and resolution, and
recognizing the work carried out by the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for
Syria, Mr. Geir Pedersen, to that end.”

The resolution was recently adopted at the United Nations by 50 states.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

4
Discuss

avatar
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Long Live SyriaDaeshbags-SuxUnseen Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Unknown
Member
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted
Unknown

Lol pot calling the kettle black. One of those countries has NO regard for women nor minorities that are NOT Sunni.

Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Nestor Arapa

Hipócritas… En la monarquía Saudi no hay democracia y EE.UU. sólo existen dos partidos, son los principales países que intervienen en asuntos internos de otros países y se atreven de hablar de Derechos Humanos.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

It’s a bit laughable that Saudis are bothering about human rights and electoral processes. It’s the pot calling the kettle black.

Long Live Syria
Guest
Long Live Syria

Hmm. short memory or Selective Amnesia for the Saudis & US for their own excellent history of Human Rights they are maintaining that are a role model for the whole world to follow them?