Chairman of the State Duma (lower house of parliament) Defense Committee, Admiral Vladimir Komoedov, has noted that the Chinese military’s desire to upgrade ties with Syria could be the first step towards forming a military and political coalition of non-NATO countries.

“The Chinese military in Syria is the first step towards putting together a serious military-political coalition dominated by countries that are not aligned with the aggressive NATO bloc.

The time has come to form such a coalition,” the lawmaker told journalists on Friday, commenting on a report about the Chinese Defense Ministry seeking to boost military cooperation with Syria. The report cited a statement made by Guan Youfei, Head of the Chinese Central Military Commission’s Office for International Military Cooperation, at a meeting with Syrian Defense Minister General Fahd Jassem al-Freij in Damascus.

Komoedov added that if Russia, China, India and Iran pooled efforts in the Middle East, the problem of liquidating the illegal Islamic state and the terrorism it produces would be resolved within a year.

“It’s not just the powerful military potential of these players but also serious political influence,” the parliamentarian stressed.

According to Komoedov, Russia, China, India and Iran all have common interests in the region, as “peace and stability in the Middle East is needed” for economic and political stability throughout Europe and Asia. “That is why other countries could join the coalition that we are discussing. I am glad that at last there is an understanding on the issue at the highest international level,” the admiral proclaimed.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 162
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    173
    Shares
ALSO READ  Over 40 US trucks enter Syria with materials to expand military bases: video

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
andy
andy
2016-08-20 16:58

Unity of this four country is REALLY GOOD news for muslim world,Now terrorist country and muslim killer will be think twice before start to killing innocent muslims

Daeshbags Sux
Daeshbags Sux
2016-08-20 20:14
Reply to  andy

Funny fact : muslims are mostly killed by… muslims… And innocent muslms are those who… Don’t give a f**k about the book because q’ran states jihad is mandatory! Except if you are sick, disabled or have mental problems…

Unknown
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted
Unknown
2016-08-20 21:39
Reply to  Daeshbags Sux

Here’s another fact. More Muslims have killed the likes of ”ISIS”, jabha al nusra, and others than non-muslims for that matter. Ever recall Mohammad telling his followers when they asked him to bless Najd? Thats the origin of the terrorists who follow the doctrine you see as the real muslims. Btw, neither Mecca nor Medina are in that area.

Nestor Makhno
Nestor Makhno
2016-08-20 22:00
Reply to  Daeshbags Sux

You don’t know anything about the meaning of jihad. The real mening of jihad is fighting against one’s own weaknesses in order to improve yourself. Morally and spiritual.

mookins
Newbie
Commenter
mookins
2016-08-20 23:04
Reply to  Nestor Makhno

d**n straight! And furthermore, I’ll say it’s the same thing as ‘tapas’ or ‘straightening by fire’ that they recognize in India.

What Harrison wrote about in ‘Savoy Truffle’: You know that what you eat you are/ But what is sweet now, turns so sour’.

LookMoo
LookMoo
2016-08-21 15:46
Reply to  Nestor Makhno

It is “Jihad by the sword” that of interest.. the other 3 Jihads are no major problems.

Frank
Regular
Commenter
Frank
2016-08-20 17:49

In other words Russia and China will really fight terrorism while NATO/US keeps funding,training and arming terrorists.

Daeshbags Sux
Daeshbags Sux
2016-08-20 21:43
Reply to  Frank

Where do you see NATO action in Syria/Iraq? I’m not saying that some NATO countries didn’t do terribly wrong, some others have tried to help sincerely, especially kurdish people, yazidis, assyrians, etc and without their action, there’d had been serious ethnic/sectarian “cleansing”. Now, one thing is clear and Putin knows it : he can’t put all the NATO countries in the same bag and BTW, without being in, Russia is associated with NATO and they participated to several common drills and even sent one of their cruisers to escort the only non US NATO aircraft carrier. Now, admiral Komoedov would… Read more »

Unknown
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted
Unknown
2016-08-20 21:41

This is not something America would personally want. After all China means too much to them seeing where they do their so-called ”free trade deals”.