BEIRUT, LEBANON (9:00 P.M.) – The Russian military’s losses between 2015 and 2018 have been revealed in a research article posted by The National Interest publication.

Citing open source infromation, The National Interest reported that between 2015 and 2018, the Russian military lost at least 19 air assets, including 11 helicopters and 8 jets, resulting in the death of 23 crew members and 37 passengers.

The article argues that while 60 deaths was a lot, it was unable to prevent the Russian Aerospace Forces from continuing their campaign inside Syria.

“However, these losses were too small to prevent the aerospace forces [Russian Aerospace Forces] and naval aviation from completing more than 39,000 sorties in Syria by mid-2018, which changed the course of the conflict in favor of [President Bashar] Assad,” they added.

In contrast, the publication points out that between 2014 and 2020, the United States lost lost only one F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter and the V-22 Osprey.

It should be noted, however, that the Russian Air Force has conducted a far greater amount of sorties than the U.S. military in Syria.

Earlier this month, Konstantin Sivkov, deputy president of the Russian Academy of Missile and Artillery Sciences for Information Policy and doctor of military sciences, said that the United States could destroy the Russian Hmeimim base in Syria with Tomahawk missiles.

The Russian and U.S. armed forces have never engaged in combat against one another in Syria, despite their close proximity.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share
ALSO READ  Large US military convoy enters Syria from Iraq

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Willy Van Damme
Willy Van Damme
2020-03-24 22:31

The National Interest is a nationalistic and politically right wing publication saying on its website: “The National Interest seeks to serve this country’s wider national interest.” So be careful, it could be true or it could be another example of propaganda. Al Masdar when quoting media like this should warn its readers for this. This article is to say the least very unprofessional.

Nestor Arapa
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Nestor Arapa
2020-03-25 00:55

Comparto tu opinión

Daeshbags-Sux
Daeshbags-Sux
2020-03-25 01:07

NI was created by Nixon’s buddies, Nixon even chaired the board if I remember well… Tricky d**k, as a Republican, was way more ‘cool’ than Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson… Politics in the US is way more complicated than you seem to think… Just think that it was a Republican who abolished slavery while Dems wanted to keep slaves… Nixon pulled US militaies out of Vietnam and befriended Mao Zedong, LBJ made Vn an all out dirty war and organised a [botched] false flag attack on USS Liberty in order to invade Egypt, had the Israelis not failed to sink the… Read more »

Mykola Kuzmenko
Mykola Kuzmenko
2020-03-25 02:49

National

Rhodium 10
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Rhodium 10
2020-03-24 21:35

Most of that losses have been accidents like the An 26 in Latakia..and not 11 heli but 7..

Tartus 69
Tartus 69
2020-04-18 21:58

8 jets what a load of rubbish….its 2 actually. The open source was deliberately quoting Israel’s losses as Russian losses a common psyche trick used more frequently of late.