In May 2014 four people were gunned down at a Jewish museum in Brussels, part of a string of anti-Semitic attacks in Europe carried out by Islamic extremists.

Amid high security French national Mehdi Nemmouche, 33, went on trial on 10 January, accused of being the gunman.

Nemmouche, who had returned to Europe after fighting with jihadist forces in Syria, is on trial along with Nacer Bendrer, 30, who allegedly supplied him with a revolver and an assault rifle.

On 26 May 2014, he allegedly shot an Israeli couple, a Belgian museum worker and a French volunteer during an attack which lasted only 82 seconds.

“As you have seen, he is serene, calm, and he will decide for the moment when he will speak,” his lawyer, Henri Laquay, told reporters.

The first two days of the trial will be taken up by reading out the 200 pages of the indictment.

Both men face life sentences if convicted of the charge of “terrorist murder”.

More than 100 witnesses are due to testify.

Nemmouche’s family is of Algerian origin but he grew up in the industrial city of Roubaix, near the Belgian border.

He was arrested in Marseille six days after the attack, after arriving on a coach from Brussels.

Prosecutors claim he was still carrying the weapons used in the massacre.

They say he fought with a jihadist faction in Syria from 2013 to 2014, where he met Najim Laachraoui, a member of the gang which went on to carry out suicide bombings in Brussels that killed 32 people in March 2016.



Source: Sputnik

Share this article:
  • 32
ALSO READ  Syrian Army takes control of 2 towns along key highway in northeast Syria

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

One thing sad : cops didn’t do like BRI or GIGN during Paris attacks : they didn’t shot these mofos on the spot. It’s a pity my taxes will pay for a 4-stars lifelong prison fee for such creeps. Moreover, since these are, from a meal point of view, irregular combatants since ‘jihad’ is a war, the Hague convention allows summary executions…

Famed Member
Stern Daler

@Daeshbags-Sux, either kill as irregulars or make the states where the Ummah Muslim reign pay for their keep.