India has plans to upgrade the Su-30MKI with modern “radar and weapons capabilities and also enhance features that tackle obsolescence management and electronic warfare aspects”, Indian Air Force Chief Air Chief Marshal Rakesh Kumar Bhadauria confirmed on Friday. This reported by Sputnik.

An Air Force Veteran and senior defence analyst said the upgraded radar would likely be the NIIP N035 Irbis E (Snow Leopard), a 20 KW class steerable hybrid ESA radar fitted on the Su-35.

“At full power, the radar can detect an F-35 at a distance of 58-km (36-mi), In tracking mode, the distance drops to 29km,” Vijainder K Thakur, Air Force veteran and defence analyst having hawk eyes on technological development said.

Designed by the Tikhomirov Scientific Research Institute (NIIP) in Moscow’s Zhukovsky city, the Irbis-E is a direct evolution of the BARS design, all-weather multimode airborne radars of a Russian family, but significantly more powerful.

The radar is cited at an average power rating of 5 kilowatts, with 2 kilowatts CW rating for illumination. The NIIP claim twice the bandwidth and improved frequency agility over the BARS, and better electronic counter-countermeasures capability.

However, Harsh Vardhan Thakur, an experimental test pilot said: “When defining pick up and rack ranges for the F-35, the low-observability may have been exaggerated. I think F-35 can be picked up at larger ranges, just as a J-20 can.”

It is expected that upgrading the Su-30MKI will not take much time as Russia already implemented significant upgrades including radar and engines on the Su-30SM which is in the service of the Russian Air Force.

ALSO READ  Russia showcases first launch of new Onyx cruise missile: video

Vijainder K Thakur said Russia had integrated Su35 IRBIS-E Radar and AL-41F-C1 engines on a Su-30 airframe with the Su-30SM, which represents a convergence of the two platforms independently developed from the Su-27, aimed at mitigating logistics & maintenance overheads.

In 2018, Indian Air Force Sukhoi Su-30MKI reportedly managed to detect the latest Chinese Chengdu J-20 jet fighter, supposed to be a top-of-the-line stealth aircraft operated by China’s People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF).

J-20 fighter jets, as claimed by China, are made up of radar-absorbing materials that are supposed to make it hard to detect at long ranges.

Earlier this month, the German radar-maker Hensoldt claimed that it managed to track two American made F-35s from a pony farm for almost 100 miles (about 150 km) during an air show, the C4ISRNet website reported.

 

Source: RU Aviation

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

9
Discuss

avatar
4 Comment threads
5 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

Less performing than a good IRST, not speaking about a 2nd gen QWIP India can get from the French. I don’t get the interest…

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

For the Hensoldt case, F-35 in air-shows or doing casual travels wear Luneberg lenses making them non-stealth. This test has zero value, they should place their radar close to a F-35 base or some drill like Red Flag or Atlantic Trident.

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

If you can only detect a F-35 from 58km and achieve a lock from 29km, you’re in serious trouble, even the 90’s AOM-120C engages you from 120km

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

ooopsss, AIM-120C, and a version of Meteor modified for F-35 is close to introduction

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

I could see pictures of J-20 with areas where coating was gone : you directly saw the airframe’s yellow composites. It’s very different of F-35 or F-22

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

who both have plates made of radar-absorbing materials between the airframe and the coating. The coating is more a way to protect the plates and a…

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

… filler between the plates, not the main thing…

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

The Chinese have it all wrong, no surprise Indian radars “see” J-20 and IAF says it’s not stealth!

Marg bar jomhuri Eslami
Guest
Marg bar jomhuri Eslami

Chinese managed to hack airframe’s CATIA files, neither the real thing about stealth, nor the sensors array.